The following interference from Facebook information censors led me to post the link here, instead of on Facebook.
Should Facebook's "fact-checkers" be the one's who make your mind up for you, or would you rather be the judge?
The warning above states, "this is NOT a standford study." I did an F3 search on the page. There is no mention of Stanford.
Furthermore, the "fact-checkers" state that "It is, as its title says, a hypothesis and not a scientist's report on new data."
So fucking what? Since when is it illegal to hypothesise? Why should Facebook users be deprived of reading hypotheses?
The "fact-checkers" also make the claim that, "The journal that published it self-identifies as a journal of speculations and radical ideas, not a documenter of new knowledge."
You tell me, is the The National Center for Biotechnology Information a journal of speculations and radical ideas?
Here is the article I want to link to,
Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis
When will this government-imposed nightmare end?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please feel free to leave your comments, insults, or threats.